The Video the Smithsonian Censored

“A Fire in My Belly,” the video project made in 1987 by David Wojnarowicz which got famously removed by the Smithsonian from their “Hide/Seek” queer desire retrospective at the National Portrait Gallery in 2010 is posted in full above.

Inspired by surrealist filmmaker Luis Buñuel, “A Fire” is a silent, stream-of-conscious compilation of bizarre imagery (a rotating eyeball), newspaper clippings (crime headlines in Mexico), black & white vintage video of wrestlers and cockfights.

But it’s the last 4 minutes, starting at the 13:20-minute mark, that got the Catholic League up in arms, demanding that the Smithsonian remove it entirely from the exhibit. The League and some members of Congress claimed that the 11-second depiction of ants crawling on a crucifix (gasp!) was “designed to insult and inflict injury and assault the sensibilities of Christians.”

You bet damn right it was! Wojnarowicz was an angry man up until his death in 1992, angry for feeling invisible, angry for contracting AIDS.

‎”I want to throw up because we’re supposed to quietly and politely make house in this killing machine called America and pay taxes to support our own slow murder and I’m amazed we’re not running amok in the streets, and that we can still be capable of gestures of loving after lifetimes of all this,” he said.

But his anger, his offensive intention is still no reason for censorship. Blake Gopnik wrote in the Washington Post:

If every piece of art that offended some person or some group was removed from a museum, our museums might start looking empty – or would contain nothing more than pabulum. Goya’s great nudes? Gone. The Inquisition called them porn.

Norman Rockwell would get the boot, too, if I believed in pulling everything that I’m offended by: I can’t stand the view of America that he presents, which I feel insults a huge number of us non-mainstream folks. But I didn’t call for the Smithsonian American Art Museum to pull the Rockwell show… His admirers got to have their say, and his detractors, including me, got to rant about how much they hated his art. Censorship would have prevented that discussion, and that’s why we don’t allow it.

Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) has said that taxpayer-funded museums should uphold “common standards of decency.” But such “standards” don’t exist, and shouldn’t, in a pluralist society. My decency is your disgust, and one point of museums, and of contemporary art in general, is to test where lines get drawn and how we might want to rethink them. A great museum is a laboratory where ideas get tested, not a mausoleum full of dead thoughts and bromides.

Tyler Green wrote in ArtInfo about the larger issues this censorship presents to the American LGBT experience:

A key part of these events is the refusal of religious conservatives to acknowledge that gays and lesbians are Americans in full, as worthy of being studied and contextualized by historians as Catholics or Montanans. The religious right wants nothing less than for gays and lesbians to be made as invisible as possible, to be hidden or removed from our shared national history.

Ironically, almost 20 years after his death, Wojnarowicz is still reliving his nightmare — his mouth being sewed shut with thread.

“A Fire in My Belly” also includes several seconds of masturbatory foreplay, which no one really mentioned during the controversy. Shot under strobe lights, it took me like 20 minutes to get some good screen caps. You’re welcome.

Interview: Do We Need Social Networks Just for Gay Men?

Following the closure of DList (the gay MySpace) and the subsequent launch of Ragap (a gay Argentinian alternative to Twitter), I was approached by Tom Avendaño of El Pais (Madrid’s daily newspaper) to comment on whether there’s a need to have social networks specifically designed for gay men. You can read the Spanish article here, and right below you can read the entire unedited interview in English. Is it fair to say that gays invented social networks? Were hook-up sites like Gaydar the basis for current mainstream social networks? I wouldn’t say gays created social networks. I think every niche group and minority has the need to meet like-minded individuals. For Facebook it started with college students. Gay men did make a great community out of the early AOL M4M chatrooms that eventually evolved into the full-blown media company, PlanetOut (once owner of The Advocate and Gay.com). Argentina has just created a Twitter for gays. Thoughts? There already is a Twitter for gays. It’s called Twitter. What’s great about social networks is that you can find your village and make it as small or big as possible. I don’t see the sense to segregate our communities to other more specific networks, unless you are still closeted. What is it about social networks that attracts the gay community? Beyond the need to get laid with sites like Manhunt and Grindr, gay men are immediately attracted to new online social networks like Instagram out of need to connect with other gay men. Not everyone lives in San Francisco or Madrid. And for the eye candy, of course. Why do you think the heterosexual demographic never embraced social networking? The heterosexual community has embraced social networking and oftentimes for similar reasons. There are plenty of scandalously-clad straight girls on Twitter and insecure, self-deprecating straight guys on Tumblr. What are the main social networks for gays now that DList’s shutdown? The best gay-specific social network out there right now is GayCities.com. You can find gay hotspots in over 200 cities all over the world and the locals who frequent them. It’s great for jet-setters looking for that insider experience. I like it because It’s a very useful service. Even though gays have hit the mainstream with Facebook and Twitter there are still experiences and events that are catered specifically to gays and lesbians. And without them, how vibrant would gay life be? Like watching the Superbowl without Madonna at half-time. I have also been playing with Thingbox out of the UK, it’s probably the closest to DList but with a better design and way more user-friendly. What have been the main social networks for gays throughout history? Throughout the decades, younger gays have adopted new networks of their own. From Manhunt to Grindr, from Gay.com to GayCities.com, from Facebook to Path, from Tumblr to Instagram. I definitely see a big shift towards mobile apps. BOY TOYS TALK BACK: Are you conducting research or writing an article about technology, social media and the gay community? Get in touch with me. I give good sound bites.